Friday 27 February 2015

how is gothic language and imager used to develop themes and characters in Dr Faustus


How is gothic language and imagery used to develop themes and characters in Dr Faustus




I think Gothic language and imagery is used well to develop themes and characters within the play, such as being used to develop Faustus’s fear of hell and his oncoming death, through the use of imagery such as the Christ’s blood in heaven or Faustus’s final rejection of forgiveness or the theme of conflict being developed by the contrast of Renaissance and medieval culture, Contrasting Faustus and the knight or Wagner and Robin, as well as the contrast of the ‘good’ and ‘evil’ angel.

One way gothic language and imagery is used, is to show and then develop the character of Faustus’s fear of hell and therefore his oncoming doom. At the beginning of Dr Faustus, Mephistopheles will never be cashed in, as according to him “I think hells a fable”, however come the final act of the play he announces “Hell strives with grace for conquest in my breast, what shall I do to shun the snares of the death.” This is also shown with use of language in Dr Faustus by the final scene Faustus is shown to be scared and panicked signified by the heavy use of punctuation as well as by the use of prose compared to the metre used earlier. The fact that he loses the rhythm and control of his speech, that he showed earlier on in the play signifies Faustus’s panic at his death, and what he now believes to be descent to hell. Showing how he now believes in hell, compared to his earlier disbelief.

Gothic language and imagery is also used to highlight and develop the theme of conflict within the play. There are multiple types of conflict within Dr Faustus ranging from examples of Religious conflicts with Catholicism and Protestantism, to social conflict with the conflict between the knight and Faustus. An example of such conflict is Faustus using his powers to grow a pair of horns upon the knights’ head. This conflict between the knight and Faustus could be seen as symbolic for the conflict for the Medieval age and the renaissance that was overtaking it and Europe at the time, with the knight representing the old feudal age, where status was determined solely from birth, conflicting with Faustus who represents the renaissance, a time where people could rise through other means than just their birth, just as Faustus has. The conflict between Catholicism and Protestantism in Dr Faustus is shown by the good angel saying “Faustus, repent yet, God will pity thee” with the evil angel then retorting “Thou art a spirit, God cannot pity thee”, this exemplifies the conflict between the belief systems of Catholicism and Protestantism. With the good angel representing the Catholic view of free will, that humans have the choice to be redeemed or damned, and that it is only by our own free will and choice can we be either damned or forgiven hence the line of “repent yet, God will pity thee”. Whereas in contrast the evil angel represents the Protestants view, that there is at least some degree of predestination. This is the belief that God has already chosen those who will go to heaven, though there is great debate over who these people are and whether they can ‘lose’ this ’privilege’, and the rest, the by and large majority, are damned no matter the actions they make, no matter how righteous or good they are. This is the view the evil angel spouts “Thou art a spirit, God cannot pity thee” suggesting that Faustus’s souls destination is decided one way or another and there is little he can do about it.

Another way Gothic language and imagery is used is to show how Faustus rejects god at every chance he is given for redemption even in his final hours he rejects the offer of redemption. From the very beginning of the play Faustus rejects God, with the ‘good’ angel saying to him “sweet Faustus, leave that execrable art” and to think of “heaven and heavenly things” right up until the final moments, just as Faustus is reaching for the blood of Christ and redemption, instead of calling upon God or Christ to save him, Faustus instead shouts “O, Spare me Lucifer” this final rejection damns Faustus beyond hope to hell. Throughout the play the good angel and the evil angel repeatedly appear, each time the good angel tells Faustus he can be forgiven and redeemed yet every time Faustus is tempted and convinced to continue on with his contract with Mephistopheles. This is similar to many plays at the time, known as morality plays all concerning about humanity’s relation with their soul as well as dealing with the conflict of virtue vs. temptation, this conflict is portrayed throughout Dr Faustus.

A theme that is developed by Gothic imagery and language is the theme of sin within the play. Faustus at one point or another throughout the play committed of all seven cardinal sins, greed, lust, envy etc. Though when all seven sins are paraded in front of him he appears to be disgusted by them saying to gluttony “I’ll see thee hanged” and shouting at lechery “away to hell, to hell”, yet he has in some form or another committed these sins, such as lechery when his last wish is for “that heavenly Helen which I saw of late” or envy, he is envious of so many because he hates the fact that he was born to a peasant family whereas others were born much higher up compared to him. This contrast and juxtaposition shows that Faustus is not truly a purely evil person otherwise he would not have been disgusted and sent them away, yet nonetheless Faustus has committed all of the Cardinal sins

To conclude overall Gothic language and imagery is used to good effect to show the development of characters such as Faustus and his downfall and damnation, as well as contrasting Faustus purposeful damnation with the other sins he has committed, the cardinal seven, and developing themes such as conflict, especially conflict that was occurring at the time, the conflict between the Catholic church and protestants or the conflict between the old medieval age and the new renaissance age represented by Faustus and the Knight respectively.

Thursday 19 February 2015

Reading journal

Max Taylor-Gill; Reading list/Work

1st wave feminism;
Considered to have first formally started at the seneca falls convention in 1848, where 300 men and women gathered for the cause of equality for women, Elizabeth Stanton drafted the Seneca falls convention, which summarised their ideology and strategies.
In its early life the feminist movement was related to the temperance (anti-alcohol) and abolitionist movements.
The first feminist leaders and figureheads were mainly white and middle class, who focused mostly,though not completely, on the concerns of middle class women.
Early on in the movement feminists noticed that a lack of funding for single or widowed women was one the most severe problems for women, so they initially protested for basic and secondary education, alongside their protests for the right to vote, which would not be granted until 1928.
The way the victorian and early 20th century women protested, demonstrating, time in jail and an extreme case where a suffragette through herself underneath the queens horse at a race killing herself, threatened the so called ‘cult of domesticity’ which believed woman's place was only supposed to be in the domestic sphere.


2nd wave feminism;
Second wave feminism, though lacking a formal point that can be indicated and said “here the second wave of feminism started”, started at some point in the late 1960s and continued throughout the 1970s.
The second wave of feminism was closely involved with the anti-war movement, but more closely with the civil rights movement and the growing awareness of the needs for rights of those within other minority groups e.g gay rights.
The first annual conference of feminist groups in britain happened at Oxford in 1970 where the four main objectives of the uk’s women's movement were laid down; equal pay for equal work, equal opportunities and education, free contraception and abortion on demand and free all day, 24 hour childcare, for those in need of it.
The second wave of feminism is seen by some as becoming increasingly theoretical as the feminist movement grew and spread out, with it being commented that “Radical second-wave feminism was theoretically based on a combination of neo-Marxism and psychoanalysis”
Near the end of the second wave of feminism major divisions were starting to show within the feminist movement, over how people protested, to just how much the feminist movement wanted to achieve, One of the largest splits was over political beliefs between liberal feminists, radical feminists and marxist socialist feminists.




3rd wave feminism;
Third wave feminism started in the mid 1990s formed partially by “post colonial and post-modern thinking”
One of third wave feminisms objectives was to throw off the notion of ‘universal womanhood’ brought about by first and second wave feminists, arguing that women are just as different and separate as men, united only by their biological gender.
Some third wave feminists also argued for the “right (a) to define one’s own identity and to expect society to respect it and (b) to make decisions regarding one’s own body.” Allying parts of the movement with the LGBT movement and other social minority movements.
One statement that many see as capturing the feel of third wave feminists is this statement from Pinkfloor “It's possible to have a push-up bra and a brain at the same time."

marxism in the 20th century;
Marxism was the movement founded by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. Though Marxism as many think of it today is based off diluted and mutated versions of what Marx originally wrote, with Marxism as we know it today being influenced by the russian revolution and ‘marxists’ such as Che guevara and Fidel Castro
Standing for the destruction of the capitalist state by the organised working class, Marxism opposes reform or ‘evolutionary socialism’, “Marxism is revolutionary”
“The political curriculum of Marxism in the 20th century began, after the sheet lightning of
the Russian revolution”
After the Lenin's death, Marxism mutated into multiple beliefs all claiming to follow Marxism, this includes the “stalinist” branch, and a movement called the fourth international founded by Leon Trotsky, its purpose was to develop Marxism in theory as well as in practice, it continued to do this even after Trotsky’s assassination.
Marxism after the fall of the soviet union became increasingly fractured with the term Marxist now becoming an umbrella term for many social and political beliefs with very few agreeing with each other or resembling what Karl Marx and Frederick Engels first laid down.

Citations:
http://www.wolfgangfritzhaug.inkrit.de/documents/XXCenturyMarxism.pdf
https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/help/marxism.htm


Angela Carter’s other works
Angela carter wrote multiple fictional stories and many literary and feminist essays. Starting with two poetry collections in 1966, five quiet shoulders and unicorn. Carter then branched out to write novels, literary essays and collections of short stories, such as; the passion of new eve, the infernal desire machines of dr hoffman and burning your boats. Prior to her death Carter had started to work on a sequel to Emily Bronte's Jane Eyre, to tell the story of Adeline Vares, however when Carter died all she had written was a brief synopsis.

The passion of New Eve chapters 1.
Chapter one:  This chapter is about a woman, called Evelyn, who along with this girl who she has met and promptly forgotten the name,go to see a movie containing Tristessa De St Ange, who she loved in her childhood and teenage years in the late forties. This chapter concerns Evelyn's love of Tristessa or to be more precise the images and ideas associated with her, as we see Evelyn lose her love for Tristessa once she sees her as a human. At the conclusion of the chapter we see Evelyn be quite surprised by this girl crying over her leaving, she also mentions straight after on a very thin link her occasional preference for bondage during sex, the chapter ends with Evelyn flying to JFK airport at New York.

Context of the bloody chamber, major events three years before and after its release in 1979 (in the UK):

The bloody chamber was published in 1979 in the three years preceding its publication multiple major news stories occurred, many which marked huge events in history. In july 6th 1976 the first class of women is inducted at the united states naval academy, the first ever class of women,in the US, to be inducted for combat purpose role.
On the 4th may 1979 Margaret Thatcher, the first female prime minister in the UK came to power, seen by many as a watershed event in the fight for female equality and feminism.Though Carter herself was a large critic of Margaret Thatcher describing her as “ the madwoman who’d always been gibbering in the Tory attic”  or as “the personification of the Tory lady who’d grounded successive Tory Party conventions in a morass of meanness and cruelty” {1}
June 5th 1981 the first recognized case of AIDs comes to light when five homosexual man are diagnosed with a rare form of pneumonia, caused by a lowered immune system, that was caused by AIDs .
On september the 18th 1981 france abolished capital punishment, one of the last western european countries to do so.
On November the 12th 1981 the Church of England synod voted to admit women to holy orders, one of the first steps along the path of female ministers (leading to the recent placement of a female bishop by the Church of England.)This is an Interesting development in relation to Carter as one of her problems with organised religion was the sexism that it seemed to so often preach, this change by the Church could be seen as the start of the process of refuting Carter’s criticisms.
On december the 12th 1982,a peace protest of greenham common over 30,000 women joined hands to form a human chain, to cause a blockade around greenham RAF air base. This could be seen as both a feminist move with the women empowering themselves by aggressively protesting the Government, as well as a marxist move with the common people protesting an aggressive move of the placement of cruise missiles, by the bourgeoises ruled government, of Margaret Thatcher and the Conservative party.








Polemical:
Positive reviews;
An excerpt from the New york times, Grotesques by John Bowen,February 19, 1967{2}
Characters in Angela Carter's first novel live in "the twilight zone.They have neither enduring talent, nor ambition; they live in the moment. They are grotesque.They are grotesque, these people, yet familiar.We may look inwards and find them in each of us. We may look inwards and find them in each of us.Hyde with Jekyll's face. He is the id.


Marina warner, in the Scotsman “why Angela carter’s bloody chamber still bites” {3}
Angela Carter made an inspired, marvellous move, for which so many,will always be indebted to her.
The title story of The Bloody Chamber,directly inspired by Charles Perrault’s fairy tales of 1697,s she lingers voluptuously on its sexual inferences.Within a spirited exposé of marriage as sadistic ritual, she shapes a bright parable of maternal love. “Le Petit Chaperon rouge” (Little Red Riding Hood), is unforgettably transfigured in “The Company of Wolves”.

“Puss-in-Boots” also takes off from Perrault, spliced and spiced with opera and pantomime and commedia dell’arte motifs to create a far more exuberant, amorous and freewheeling tale than its source.She warns of the greater danger of wolves who are “hairy on the inside”.the knowledge of what it is like to be there, be on the inside, was her goal and her achievement, and it has enthralled her readers.

Carter sharpened the laconic chill of the Brothers’ cruel fairy tales like “Snow White” with her splintering fable of jealousy and incest, “The Snow Child

In this counterblast to the virtuous claims of feminism, Carter identifies the Marquis de Sade as an honest witness to the conditions of bourgeois marriage, the economics of sexual relations, and the collusion of women with their own enslavement and subjugation.the Sadeian Woman makes a Swiftian “modest proposal” about pornography, and it provides a valuable gloss on themes in The Bloody Chamber:

The literary omnivore, review; the bloody chamber {4]
Here, Carter not only invests the sexuality of these young women with some agency but also, interestingly enough, their virginity.
It is not a state of innocence, but a state of potential so powerful it provides its own protection, allowing Red to laugh in the face of the wolf, knowing that she is safe.
The existential questions posed to these women as they discover the limitations society puts on them by virtue of being women are rendered lushly, making them all the more heartbreaking.
The Bloody Chamber, as Carter intends, extracts the dark sexuality from fairy tales and shows us their beating hearts. Dark sexuality is the watchword here, as young women discover their agency through their sexuality.

Helen Simpson on Angela Carter’s bloody chamber {5}
The Bloody Chamber is like a multifaceted glittering diamond reflecting and refracting a variety of portraits of desire and sexuality.

Chamber are fired by the conviction that human nature is not immutable, that human beings are capable of change. Some of their most brilliant passages are accounts of metamorphoses.

The heroines of these stories are struggling out of the straitjackets of history and ideology and biological essentialism.

the unnamed first-person heroine,changes during the narrative, and finishes by escaping her inheritance - female masochism as a modus vivendi (and morendi) - after a full-scale survey of its temptation.

Nearly all her writing is strikingly full of cultural and intertextual references, but this story is extremely so. It is an artfully constructed edifice of signs and allusions and clues.
the heroine victim is rescued from decapitation by the sudden arrival of her pistol-toting mother, who puts a bullet through the Marquis' head. Her fate is not immutable after all; she discovers that her future looks quite different now that she has escaped from the old story and is learning to sing a new song.

In each one of them, lovers are lethal, traditional romantic patterns kill, and sex leads to death.
“The Snow Child" is only a page long, just a few hundred words, and yet in some ways it is the most shocking piece of all, with its incestuous rape and murderous sexual rivalry.

But, of course, interpreting these mysteries is just what Carter does attempt in "The Company of Wolves", at the end of which Red Riding Hood refuses to feel fear (she "burst out laughing; she knew she was nobody's meat") or disgust (she will delouse the wolf and eat the lice "in a savage marriage ceremony"), and ends sleeping "sweet and sound" in bed with the now "tender wolf".

There are a myriad such musical echoes in this collection - herbivores and carnivores, death and the maiden, the image of a system of Chinese boxes opening one into another - while certain phrases like "pentacle of virginity" or indeed "the bloody chamber" crop up repeatedly

BOOK REVIEW: THE PASSION OF NEW EVE BY ANGELA CARTER {6}

Evelyn, the protagonist, His past is smeared with women’s pain that he caused by having a heart as bare and barren as a “desert”. He is transformed by another character called ‘Mother’ into a woman.
Mother is not a man’s woman, but a woman with eternal and controlling fertility. She appeals to her followers because she is unthreatening and is in turn their mother. They intend to live forever without men

the plot takes is relevant to something; containing some sort of symbolism attaining to equal rights, liberty or feminism. Carter writes with such fervour that some passages and certain words spark out at you in their violence

After being with Mother and her tribe of severe women Eve encounters danger and has to develop a female personality to be a convincing woman enough to survive

There are many other examples of duality or twin images that create paradoxes within and for many of the characters. In a way, all the characters fit seamlessly together because of the facades and multiple personalities.

The novel itself signifies things that a crazy, yet with a touch of logical discourse. It could advocate order from disorder; the reader has to fathom what they think for themselves.


Critical reviews;
Position paper by Richard Gilman, a review of the sadeian woman And the Ideology of Pornography By Angela Carter {7}  (an extremely biased review)
Pornography seems to encourage the worst intellectual qualities in nearly everybody who writes about it.

Angela Carter's position is fierce, unaccommodating and aggressively stated: Pornography is a means of perpetuating the oppression of women because it conceives of sex purely in terms of power and thus reinforces men's pre-existing impulses toward the exercise of dominance.

For the most part she sees Sade in a traditional -- and somewhat excessive -- way, as a key shaper of "aspects of the modern sensibility; its paranoia, its despair, its sexual terrors, its . . . egocentricity, its tolerance of massacre, holocaust, annihilation."

There are a number of shrewd insights of this kind, but far too much of the book is in the grip of an iron set of biases and dubious presuppositions.
Miss Carter is a rigid ideologue, fervidly feminist, furiously antireligious and against transcendence of any kind.

In Miss Carter's case, the radical positions tend to injure both scholarship and clarity of thought.
Her inability or refusal to see that pornography, like any form of imagination, is an effort at compensating for finiteness, at getting past limitations. It deals with possibility, not the actual, and imaginative possibility at that. If she could see this, she wouldn't be likely to construe pornography as treating only of violence. Like so many other writers on the subject, she clearly hasn't read enough pornography to know that within its obviously circumscribed intention it's as various as any other form of expression.

She fails to see how the pornography wasn't in the service of a repressive state but precisely part of a dream of a totally, impossibly free one. That it was a dream, and not a recommendation, is crucial.

The point is that there was a greatly significant gap between Sade's sexual writings and his actual nature. Miss Carter writes that "rather than his misdeeds, is seems it was the ferocity of his imagination that led to his confinement." It was the other way round.


Bewitchment,James Wood {8}

The novel is not remotely likeable, and, like a hated teacher, it shows no interest in being likeable

Already Carter’s language is rich and bright-buttoned. One marvels at the confidence with which she rolls up the old heavy carpet of detailed narration and dangles instead her own brighter mat: menacing fairytale.

And there is much to forgive. The greatest weakness of Shadow Dance is its odour of meaninglessness.
There is something here about the danger of living life as display, and the evil of collecting humans as things, of course. But this dissolves into the texture of the novel itself

Carter’s need to deliver messages becomes comic in The Passion of New Eve (1977), which is itself an entire postal system of messages: a cathedral of hints

Most of Carter’s writing until Nights at the Circus seems to me to be coercive, theoretical in ambition, over-fermented. The same kind of detail that Christina Stead (a writer admired by Carter) lavished on her captivating egotists and eccentrics is, in Carter’s work, painted onto what Sage calls ‘shadows’ and what Jordan calls ‘roles’. And often the reader longs to escape this gilded cage. The tragedy of Angela Carter is that she died just as her work was beginning to make that escape.




Critical Anthology:
The ‘problem’ with Marxist criticism;
The ‘problems’ with Marxist criticisms are that they traditionally “tend to deal with history in a generalised way”, rarely dealing with the precise details of historic situations, or relating them closely enough to interpretations of certain literary texts.

The ‘problem’ with Feminist criticism
The ‘problems’ with feminist criticisms are that they see that “for better or worse,everything seems somehow related to everything else”, possibly seeing connections where there are none.




Viewpoint;
A story that could be viewed from a feminist perspective is; The murder of a 57 year old woman in cardigan, the only murder reported on in a four day period on UK news on the BBC despite the murder of a male in london. Showing a bias towards reporting the deaths/murder of women, possibly for shock value, still showing today’s societies sexist bias.

A story that could be viewed from a marxist perspective is; The shooting and killing of two police officers in new york, on the 21st of december. This could be viewed from a marxist perspective as the police could be viewed as a symbol of the the government, and possibly a symbol of, bourgeois rule.

{2} http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/27/specials/carter-honey.html
{9}http://mywordlyobsessions.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/book-review-heroes-and-villains-by-angela-carter/

Thursday 11 December 2014

Wolf Alice Question's


  • ragged girl with brindled lugs=      poor, ill, sickly
  • bubbling,delicious like that of a panful of fat on the fire= sounds is enjoyable to ear, happy,joyful sounding
  • her panting tongue hangs out, her red lips are thick-she trots or gallops= animalistic, unintelligent, uncultured.
  • her poor eyesight does not bother her= blind, disabled, (old beliefs of curse or gods wrath in form of disability)
  • lives without a future. She only inhabits the present tense= unintelligent, 'dumb' or 'stupid'
  • bud of flesh in the lions mouth= compassionate, possible intelligence.
  • she was an imperfect wolf= not human but neither a wolf



Wednesday 10 December 2014

How successfully has Carter re-worked a traditional story and increased its appeal to a modern audience?

. Turned from traditional patriarchal fairy tale (being rescues by the woodsman) to a new interpretation with possible feminist interpretations (she partly seduces the lycanthrope)
. 2nd wave feminism, dealing with issue of sexual control (and dominance) as well as a woman's control over her relationships with other people (especially those whom she is in a sexual or romantic relationship with)
. Turned it towards a more openly sexualised tale, as well as seeming to remove the moral that was traditionally within red riding hood, of "not trusting strangers"

Thursday 4 December 2014

In orignal Gothic, women were often presented as trembling victims pursued by predatory males. How far is this true of the first narrative in Angela Carter's collection, 'the bloody chamber'



In typical original Gothic women were often presented as 'trembling victims', in novels such as Dracula or even as far back as the original with the castle of Otranto, with Mina and Princess Isabella respectively. Often being chased and 'pursued' by predatory males such as Dracula or Manfred. What is argued though is whether or not Angela Carter's novel "the bloody chamber" continues this tradition or instead reverses or somehow changes it.

It can be argued that Angela carter does keep to the tradition of presenting Women,in the Gothic, as trembling victims, people argue this is true by pointing to;

The fact that Carter presents the Narrator as "shuddering like a horse before the race, yet also with a kind of fear" seems to directly suggest that Carter is presenting Women as trembling victims,whom are simply powerless compared to the males, the Marquis in this case who's undressing her "as if he were stripping the leaves off an Artichoke." This suggest the idea of a woman who is a helpless victim to the predatory male. The fact that she is shivering a victim, could be being used by Carter to suggest the enigmatic charisma the count has and the power that it has in enabling his control over her, emphasising her possible nature as a trembling woman before a man, a stereotypical sign of a patriarchal society.

The fact that the Narrator seems to simply accept her fate "what form shall it take" when the Marquis dictates it as fate seems to suggest that she is little more than a victim, with no free will of her own. She is told "to wait until I telephone for you." and that is what she does. The Narrator neither protests or attempts to escape she accepts her fate, as if a helpless "trembling victim.". Though some argue that Carter portrays women as possible "trembling victims" in the bloody chamber not as saying that women are weak or easily influenced, but instead saying that in a male dominated society,patriarchy, women are trained to do as they are told by any males especially those of the aristocracy or upper classes,like the Marquis is part of. 

People also argue that Carter continues to portray men as "predatory"as the original Gothic had, it's argued that she does this by;

Seeming to present the Marquis as a stereotypical Gothic male villain, a predator with no feelings or cares for others. Carter also presents the Marquis as an almost literal predator describing him as having leonine features, e.g. "dark leonine shape of his head" and "as if all his shoes had soles of velvet.".  The Marquis is also presented as predatory by the fact that he seems to have 'hunted' down our Narrator, why would a member of the Aristocracy marry a poor widowers daughter particularly after having just killed his previous wife who was a "Romanian countess." It's suggested that he goes after as she is different to his previous wives,a predator looking for a different prey. He is also shown in the light of a predator by how he teases and tempts the Narrator with the ring of keys,specifically in how he tells her not to use "the lock this single key fits" and that the room is "at the foot of the west tower, behind the still-room", instead of removing the key, he decides to leave it and tempt her with it, as if playing with her.

However other's argue that Carter actually contradicts the 'Original Gothic', with women being presented as something other than 'trembling victims' or men being as shown as something that isn't 'predatory', people argue this is shown by;

The Narrator's mother, who whilst female is presented as anything other than 'a trembling victim'. She's described as having "shot a man-eating tiger with her hand" and still carrying round her dead husband's "antique service revolver" in "her reticule.". The mother is also the figure who defeats the main predator and antagonist of 'the bloody chamber' the Marquis. Unlike the typical original Gothic female like, Mina, the Narrator's mother is not in a state of inaction, but action in saving her daughter and "put a single irreproachable bullet through my husbands head.". Carter could be using this character as a way of showing that women need not be the typical role that they're portrayed in the Original Gothic and instead they can become an active role and can as in this case defeat the antagonist, who can be seen as either a symbol of the patriarchy or as a symbol of the struggle between the domineering upper classes and the struggling lower classes.

The fact that the Narrator wields huge power over the piano player and tuner, Jean-Yves, is used to show that women in 'the bloody women' can wield power in general, especially the fact that it is a woman, typically shown as 'trembling victims', who wields power over a man, typically in the Gothic the domineering figure. This happens after the Narrator finds the red room, where simply the act of looking (an example of the idea of male gaze) allows her to gain some form of control over Jean-Yves, as well as the raw emotions and lust within us that the red room represents. The Narrator also gains control over the Marquis's funds as well as Jean-Yves, this is seen by some as Carter suggesting that women should get just as much power of some men, as men seem to have over women in classical Gothic.

It is also argued that Carter does not present all men as 'predatory' as is often done in Original Gothic. 
This being with Jean-Yves the blind piano, being blind he is symbolically completely unthreatening, he's forced to completely rely on the Narrator. He seems to be more naive and innocent than the female narrator (who traditionally is as innocent and naive as possible.) He's also described as "he looked far more terrified of me, than my Mother's daughter would have been of the Devil himself", he's said to have "blind humanity.". Some think Carter does this to counter society bias towards male domination,patriarchy, so she created a male character who is forced to rely on a female character to survive.

To conclude whilst Carter does have elements of the original Gothic in how she presents women as 'trembling women' and men as 'predatory, it is true though that Carter does not always do this in 'the bloody chamber', changing and subverting the original Gothic style, to Show influences and biases inherent within society.

Wednesday 3 December 2014

In orignal Gothic, women were often presented as trembling victims pursued by predatory males. How far is this true of the first narrative in Angela Carter's collection, 'the bloody chamber', (PLAN)

women presented as trembling victims in the 'bloody chamber'
1. When the Narrator is first being undressed " I began to shudder like a race horse before a race, yet also with a Kind of fear". " I shivered to think of that"

( why is she the trembling victim), (mention traditional Gothic women E.g. Mina from dracula or Princess Isabella from Castle of Otranto)
2. Doesn't try to do anything to try and challenge/stop her punishment. She simply accepts it as her due, with no argument against it. (possible sign of count's luring enigmatic charisma and allure) "what form shall it take?" "wait until I telephone for you"

In what ways do women in the 'bloody chamber' challenge this;
1.The mother's attitude as a whole as well as her killing of the Marquis (the description and method) "My Mother had dispatched of a man eating tiger" the antique service revolver that she "always kept in her reticule." Not a trembling victim, but a person willing to fight and not flee or tremble, (though with use of possible phallic symbol.

2.This is also challenged by the Narrator and her control over Jean-Yves after she found the Red-Room, (male gaze, act of simply looking is a method of control, or in this case gaining control, over herself and the raw emotions and lust that part of all of us). As well as her control of him and the Finance's of the Marquis's, for example She leads Jean Yves " let the blind lead the blind"

In what ways are males in the 'bloody chamber' Presented as "predatory"
1. The Marquis is described as Leonine, as a natural Predator. He pre-meditates his Murder's planning them out in fine detail as a predator would. He also Expresses and shows his control over the Narrator in how he speaks to her "my little angel" as well as in the Choker, a symbol of control as well as survival. As well as in the context of his Aristocratic fathers and family. He hunts the Narrator down, why go after a poor widows daughter when he could have a rich countess. He also plays and tempts as a predator would by specifically mentioning the key and taunting her, rather than say removing the key and prevent any temptation at all.

In what ways do males in the 'bloody chamber' challenge this description;

1.Jean-Yves, extremely  non-threatening, blind unable to hurt anyone, forced to rely on the Narrator, (he too does not challenge the fate the Marquis seems to set for him) "he looked far more terrified of me, than my Mother's daughter would have been of the Devil himself" "though they were blind" "blind humanity" he seems more innocent and naive than the Narrator himself far more of a trembling victim than any of the women within the Novel.

2. (perhaps) Possibly the Marquis as he is described at times as more of an old lion,or even a child. Perhaps once could have been a predator but no longer is or is just a spoiled child.

Saturday 18 October 2014

Overall Analysis of The Courtship of Mr Lyon and The Tiger's Bride, Angela Carter and the Gothic for the AQA A2 Lit B Exam

Overall Analysis of The Courtship of Mr Lyon and The Tiger's Bride, Angela Carter and the Gothic for the AQA A2 Lit B Exam

Task 1.
1.How does carter transcend ideological limitations which fairy tales traditionally review?
 by having the Narrator refuse be the submissive one "carter subverts the gaze" and tradition "as the bride refuses to be undressed before the tiger, he decides to unveil himself." 
2. what is Freud's "famous polarity active/passive"?
This is Freud's belief that women were inherently passive and that in opposition to this men were active, from what I can tell Freud meant this throughout all relationships and society as a whole
3.instead of the 'masculine' and 'feminine' texts, what does carter suggest?
Carter apparently suggests "a fusion of the opposites; male/female, human/no-human, nature culture. She (apparently) suggests a new kind of gender, free from social constructions, a creation of an androgynous being" 
4. who was/is Pauline Palmer? (author of this article?)
She is currently a lecturer at Birmingham university, she describes herself as working "in the field of contemporary women's fiction and lesbian writing, discussing texts in the context of feminist and queer theory"
5.what is androgyny? 
It  is the combination of masculine and feminine characteristics. Sexual ambiguity may be found in fashion, gender identity, sexual identity, or sexual lifestyle.

Task 2.
Fairy tales are generally about dominance and obedience, perpetuating patriarchal ideology, Carter writes to expose this and then to flip it on its head, to show female desire and sexual liberation, "playing a game with the reader.".
Carter sought to change and expose the binary opposites that are present in so many fairy tale, male/female culture/nature, Carter sought to do this by presenting her character as ambiguous, having a character present both sides of the binary opposites.
Carter reveals that Fairy tales are their to drill in behavioural and aspirational lessons, especially in women, Carter points out Man's wish that women almost become like the 'simulacrum' without subjectivity or how women are drilled to aspire to the right body in an almost narcissistic fashion.
Carter also shows us that beneath our layers and our "artificial skins" we are all the same, this is shown by the removal of the Narrator, in the tiger's bride, "artificial skins" and her "transformation into a beast" sharing her inner beast with everyone else's.
Carter wishes to remove all gender differences as social constructions and instead an androgynous creation, made up of a fusion of the opposites of human and non-human, nature and culture, one which "could transpose gender and sex"

1. reversal
2. contradiction
3. Indoctrinate
4. Masks
5. unification

The article is about Carters look at what she see's as Fairy tale's truly representing; binary opposites, patriarchal society and the repression and passivity of women in society by the patriarchal society. The article also discusses how Carter looks at these and then completely reverses them in her own take on Fairy tales. With active women, with characters having both attributes of a binary opposite cultured/natural e.g. the tiger and his mask. The article also discusses Carter’s proposal for a single androgynous gender in novels, composed of binary opposites, but also free from society’s gender constructions. (98)